BRYME Money · Start here
A trading risk plan before the first order
Write down what can go wrong, in money terms, before asking what might go right.
A risk plan is a written explanation of what a position might cost if the idea fails. It is not a prediction that a stop will fill, an instruction to use a particular percentage or proof of profitable trading. The value is in noticing missing assumptions before an order is sent.
Pre-trade worksheet (copy, don't submit)
- Product and entity: what exactly is being bought or contracted, through which legal provider, on which venue or terms? Re-check broker permissions.
- Account and sizing: what account currency, current balance, entry assumption and invalidation price are being used? Record units, contract multiplier and total notional, not only the required deposit.
- Planned loss: calculate price distance × units, then add estimated spread and commissions. Does the figure remain tolerable if fills are worse than planned? See the sizing arithmetic.
- Stop and failure route: what event triggers an exit, and is the instruction a stop-market or a stop-limit? Write down the consequences of a gap, a halt and a rejected or partially filled order.
- Portfolio context: could several open positions lose at the same time because they share a currency, asset, issuer or broader market exposure?
- Environment: are spreads, volatility, session hours or scheduled news outside the conditions used in the test? Read the regime worksheet.
- Evidence: where do the assumed win rate and costs come from? Distinguish a historical simulation, demo fills and real fills; none guarantees future outcomes.
Why one-position maths is not the whole plan
Imagine two positions each designed to lose $100 if its own stop fills as planned. If both depend on the same market movement, the combined planned loss in that scenario is $200, not an independent pair of $100 events. If one stop slips by another $60 and the other by $30, the combined price loss could be $290, before extra charges. These are hypothetical numbers, not maximum losses. Correlation may increase during stress precisely when diversification looked most reassuring.
| Field | Your documented answer |
|---|---|
| Product / legal provider | ________________ |
| Entry / invalidation / order type | ________________ |
| Notional / account currency / planned loss | ________________ |
| Spread + commission + financing | ________________ |
| Gap / rejected-order response | ________________ |
| Other positions exposed to same scenario | ________________ |
What a 'risk percent' does not control
Setting a small planned loss is a budgeting choice, not a guarantee. A market can skip your level, a short can rise sharply, a leveraged account can be liquidated and an OTC provider may apply a different trigger. The SEC explains stop-price slippage; FINRA explains margin-account losses beyond deposits. The position-size and expectancy calculators are planning tools only: they cannot know live liquidity, terms or future fills.
After a simulation, compare the written assumptions to what actually happened. When a strategy changes, document the change and test it on new observations rather than rewriting old results. It is also a complete and valid outcome to decide not to trade.
Sources and further reading
Links were reviewed 2026-09-24. Regulatory permissions, firm status and product terms can change; use the current official register before acting.
General information, not financial advice. Everything on BRYME Money is educational. Trading forex, crypto and derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Past performance — including any published research — does not guarantee future results. Never trade money you cannot afford to lose.